Key result
Mobile health devices are increasingly used for consumer-driven screening of atrial fibrillation, necessitating physician familiarity with these technologies, their risks, and limitations.
Why the study?
With consumer mobile health devices for AF detection becoming ubiquitous, physicians need familiarity with these technologies, their risks, limitations, and management implications across low- and high-risk populations.
Do mobile health devices improve the detection of atrial fibrillation compared to usual care?
Do mobile health devices improve the detection of atrial fibrillation compared to usual care?
Mobile health devices offer a feasible method for large-scale atrial fibrillation screening, but physicians must understand their risks, limitations, and implications for both high-risk and young populations.
Atrial fibrillation is a common arrhythmia associated with significant morbidity, mortality and decreased quality of life. Mobile health devices marketed directly to consumers capable of detecting atrial fibrillation through methods including photoplethysmography, single-lead ECG as well as contactless methods are becoming ubiquitous. Large-scale screening for atrial fibrillation is feasible and has been shown to detect more cases than usual care-however, controversy still exists surrounding screening even in older higher risk populations. Given widespread use of mobile health devices, consumer-driven screening is happening on a large scale in both low-risk and high-risk populations. Given that young people make up a large portion of early adopters of mobile health devices, there is the potential that many more patients with early onset atrial fibrillation will come to clinical attention requiring possible referral to genetic arrythmia clinic. Physicians need to be familiar with these technologies, and understand their risks, and limitations. In the current review, we discuss current mobile health devices used to detect atrial fibrillation, recent and upcoming trials using them for diagnosis of atrial fibrillation, practical recommendations for patients with atrial fibrillation diagnosed by a mobile health device and special consideration in young patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tooley et al. (2021) conducted a review in Atrial fibrillation. Mobile health devices was evaluated. Mobile health devices are increasingly used for consumer-driven screening of atrial fibrillation, necessitating physician familiarity with these technologies, their risks, and limitations.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: