Key result
Spot urine method correlates moderately with food records for evaluating daily salt intake in hypertension.
Observational (n=73)
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Kawasaki et al. developed a spot urine method (SUM) for evaluating daily salt intake using one pre-breakfast sample obtained after initial voiding upon arising. Their subjects were healthy persons who were not taking any regular medications. To determine whether SUM can be successfully used for patients taking antihypertensive drugs, we estimated daily salt intake in 73 hypertensive patients by SUM and by a food consumption method (FCM) when they were at home, and also by SUM in the hospital with a defined intake of 7 g of sodium chloride (NaCl). Forty-one patients took oral antihypertensive medications once daily, while 32 patients took none. Mean daily salt intakes by SUM during admission were 7-8 g of NaCl in both groups (95% confidence intervals: 5.0-10.6 g in the medication group; 5.2-11.1 g in the no-medication group), which corresponded well to the diet. In contrast, ambulatory daily salt intake by SUM varied widely (95% confidence intervals: 5.5-20.7 g in the medication group; 7.6-22.8 g in the no-medication group). However, the daily salt intakes determined by SUM and FCM correlated significantly with each other in the medication group (r=0.69, p<0.01) and the no-medication group (r=0.66, p<0.01). SUM is therefore a reliable method for evaluating daily salt intake in patients taking antihypertensive medication as well as unmedicated patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kawamura et al. (2006) conducted an observational in Hypertension (n=73). Spot urine method (SUM) vs. Food consumption method (FCM) was evaluated on Correlation of daily salt intake determined by SUM and FCM (r=0.69, p=<0.01). The spot urine method correlated with the food consumption method for evaluating daily salt intake in hypertensive patients taking medication and unmedicated patients.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: