Key result
Pretreatment echocardiography compared to MUGA did not significantly influence the risk of all-cause death or heart failure in patients with early breast cancer (HR 0.8).
Why the study?
Echocardiography and MUGA scans are commonly used to assess cardiac function during cancer therapy, but the optimal imaging strategy and its impact on outcomes remain unknown.
Does pre-treatment MUGA compared to echocardiography influence the risk of all-cause death or heart failure in patients with early breast cancer?
Cohort (n=2,060)
No
Does pre-treatment MUGA compared to echocardiography influence the risk of all-cause death or heart failure in patients with early breast cancer?
Hazard Ratio: 0.8 (95% CI 0.6–1.1)
Absolute Event Rate: 9.1% vs 11.5%
p-value: p=0.159
In patients with early breast cancer, the choice of pre-treatment cardiac imaging modality (MUGA vs. echocardiography) and the lack of follow-up imaging did not adversely affect long-term mortality or heart failure outcomes.
Pretreatment echocardiography or MUGA choice may not affect death or heart failure risk; leaves open optimal surveillance strategy in early breast cancer.
Background: Many patients with breast cancer receive therapies with the potential to cause cardiotoxicity. Echocardiography and multiple-gated acquisition (MUGA) scans are the most used modalities to assess cardiac function during treatment in high-risk patients; however, the optimal imaging strategy and the impact on outcome are unknown. Methods: Consecutive patients with stage 0-3 breast cancer undergoing pre-treatment echocardiography or MUGA were identified from a tertiary care cancer center from 2010-2019. Demographics, medical history, imaging data and clinical events were collected from hospital charts and administrative databases. The primary outcome is a composite of all-cause death or heart failure event. Clinical and imaging predictors of outcome were evaluated on univariable and multivariable analyses. Results: 1028 patients underwent pre-treatment MUGA and 1032 underwent echocardiography. The groups were well matched for most clinical characteristics except patients undergoing MUGA were younger, had more stage 3 breast cancer and more HER2 over-expressing and triple negative cases. Routine follow-up cardiac imaging scan was obtained in 39.3% of patients with MUGA and 38.0% with echocardiography. During a median follow-up of 2448 (1489, 3160) days, there were 194 deaths, including 7 cardiovascular deaths, and 28 heart failure events with no difference in events between the MUGA and echocardiography groups. There were no imaging predictors of the primary composite outcome or cardiac events. Patients without follow-up imaging had similar adjusted risk for the composite outcome compared to those with imaging follow-up, hazard ratio 0.8 (95% confidence interval 0.5,1.3), p=0.457. Conclusion: The selection of pretreatment echocardiography or MUGA did not influence the risk of death or heart failure in patients with early breast cancer. Many patients did not have any follow-up cardiac imaging and did not suffer worse outcomes. Cardiovascular deaths and heart failure event rates were low and the value of long-term cardiac imaging surveillance should be further evaluated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Early breast cancer (n=2,060). Pre-treatment echocardiography vs. Pre-treatment MUGA was evaluated on Composite of all-cause death or heart failure event (HR 0.8, 95% CI 0.6, 1.1, p=0.159). Pretreatment echocardiography compared to MUGA did not significantly influence the risk of all-cause death or heart failure in patients with early breast cancer (HR 0.8).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: