Key result
Cardiac imaging yields actionable care changes in up to ~13% of breast cancer patients.
Why the study?
Guidelines recommend pretreatment cardiac imaging before cardiotoxic breast cancer therapies, but the utility of this imaging is largely based on expert opinion.
Does cardiac imaging lead to clinically actionable changes in care in breast cancer patients?
Cohort (n=93)
No
Does cardiac imaging lead to clinically actionable changes in care in breast cancer patients?
The relatively low yield of routine cardiac imaging in breast cancer patients underscores the need for targeted imaging strategies to optimize resource allocation.
Low yield supports selective over routine cardiac imaging in breast cancer; leaves open optimal patient selection and frequency.
INTRODUCTION: Breast cancer affects over 25,000 women annually in Canada and has seen improved survival rates due to advances in screening and treatment. However, cardiotoxic therapies including anthracyclines and trastuzumab have made cardiovascular disease a leading cause of death among survivors. Baseline left ventricular ejection fraction is a reliable predictor of heart failure, and various guidelines recommend pretreatment cardiac imaging; however, its utility is largely based on expert opinion. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study analyzed 93 breast cancer patients treated at a single cancer centre in Northwestern Ontario between 2012 and 2017 to determine the yield (defined as imaging leading to clinically actionable changes in care) of imaging. RESULTS: = 30, mean age = 59.37 ± 10.91). Due to the very small sample size in cohort A, findings are presented for qualitative insight only. Cohort B had the highest imaging yield (13.33%), while cohorts A and C showed lower yields (7.14% and 4.17%) with more frequent imaging. Predictors of higher yield varied, with cohort B identifying the most, including diabetes and coronary artery disease. CONCLUSIONS: These findings underscore the need for targeted cardiac imaging to optimize resource allocation and patient outcomes, particularly in resource-limited settings such as Northwestern Ontario. Subsequent investigations should seek to stratify proactive versus reactive interventions, evaluate outcomes, refine imaging guidelines, and gather more data on patients receiving trastuzumab.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shortreed et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Breast cancer (n=93). Cardiac imaging was evaluated on Yield of imaging (defined as imaging leading to clinically actionable changes in care). Cardiac imaging in breast cancer patients yielded clinically actionable changes in care in 4.17% to 13.33% of cases across cohorts, highlighting the need for targeted imaging.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: