A theoretical equation for calculating piezoelectric constants (dij) of polymer crystals has been derived and applied to poly(vinylidene fluoride) form 1. The calculated d 33 = -2.5 × 10−11 C/N, is in good agreement with the value of -2 × 10−11 C/N measured by the x-ray method. The calculated d 31, -0.025 × 10−11 C/N, is smaller by two digits than d 33, consistent with the experimental result that the x-ray (002) spot was not shifted nearly as much by the application of the electrostatic field as in the case of d 33 The macroscopic piezoelectric constants d M 31 and d M 33 have been estimated by using a model where the piezoelectric crystal form 1 is embedded in the nonpiezoelectric amorphous matrix; d M 31 = 0.6 × 10−11 C/N and d: = -1.4 × 10−11 C/N at room temperature and d M 31 = 6.8 × 10−13 C/N and d M 33 = -0.5 × 10−11 C/N below the glass transition temperature (Tg ), respectively. These are in the same order as the values observed both at room temperature and below Tg . In the present estimation the contribution of crystalline piezoelectric effect to the macroscopic piezoelectricity has been found to be negligible for d M 31 but significant for d M 33. d M 31 has been found to be controlled by the electric and mechanical heterogeneity between amorphous and crystalline regions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tashiro et al. (1981) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: