Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Of six strains of Ruminococcus bromii studied, five grew in a minimal chemically defined medium containing minerals, NH(4) (+) as nitrogen source, sulfide or sulfate as sulfur source, fructose as energy and carbon source, isobutyrate or 2-methylbutyrate and carbonic acid-bicarbonate as additional carbon sources, and the vitamins biotin, riboflavin, pyridoxine, vitamin B(12) (replaced by L-methionine), pantethine, and tetrahydrofolate. The strains also could utilize cysteine or thiosulfate but not methionine; and strain Z3 failed to use dithiothreitol, thioglycolate, sulfite, or beta-mercaptoethanol as sole sources of sulfur. Mixtures of amino acids, peptides (Casitone), urea, nitrate, asparagine, or glutamine failed to replace NH(4) (+) as N source. Three strains isolated from Americans were identical in nutritional features, whereas one from a Japanese and one from a South African native differed slightly in having requirements for fewer vitamins. One strain from the cecum of a sow grew well in a rumen fluid-supplemented medium but not in the various chemically defined media plus Casitone. The nutritional features suggest that the environment which selects R. bromii contains relatively little amino acid nitrogen and a relatively large amount of NH(4) (+)-N and indicate that these bacteria must depend upon other bacteria such as those that produce NH(4) (+) from urea or protein and those that produce branched-chain volatile acids to grow.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Herbeck et al. (1974) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: