Key result
Phased-array intracardiac echocardiography from the pulmonary artery correlated with transesophageal echocardiography for evaluating spontaneous echo contrast.
Why the study?
Does phased-array intracardiac echocardiography from the pulmonary artery accurately evaluate the left atrial appendage compared to transesophageal echocardiography in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Cross-Sectional (n=80)
Does phased-array intracardiac echocardiography from the pulmonary artery accurately evaluate the left atrial appendage compared to transesophageal echocardiography in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Phased-array ICE from the pulmonary artery is a feasible and safe alternative to TEE for evaluating the left atrial appendage in patients undergoing AF ablation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support phased-array ICE from the pulmonary artery as TEE alternative in AF; leaves open prospective validation before adoption.
AIMS: The left atrial appendage (LAA) represents the major source of cardiac thrombus formation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Phased-array intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) has become available and frequently used during catheter ablation of AF. We attempted to study the feasibility of using ICE for the visualization and evaluation of the LAA from the pulmonary artery (PA) in patients with AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eighty patients with AF undergoing catheter ablation (70 males, 57.5 ± 9.1 years) were included. Transoesophageal echocardiography was performed on the prior day before the catheter ablation, and ICE was performed just before the transseptal puncture during the catheter ablation. The ICE catheter was advanced up into the PA from the femoral vein, where the LAA was clearly and entirely visualized by manipulating the ICE catheter. We compared the degree of spontaneous echo contrast, and the correlation was obtained between the ICE and TEE (κ = 0.534, P < 0.001). Furthermore, the LAA flow velocity (LAA emptying and filling velocities) measured by ICE had a good correlation to that measured by TEE (R = 0.872, P < 0.01 and R = 0.753, P < 0.01, respectively). No patients developed any complications. CONCLUSION: The utilization of ICE in the PA is feasible for the observation and evaluation of the LAA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nishiyama et al. (2015) conducted a cross-sectional in atrial fibrillation (n=80). Phased-array intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) from the pulmonary artery vs. Transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) was evaluated on Degree of spontaneous echo contrast correlation between ICE and TEE (κ = 0.534, p=<0.001). Phased-array intracardiac echocardiography from the pulmonary artery correlated with transesophageal echocardiography for evaluating spontaneous echo contrast.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: