Key result
Dipyridamole thallium-201 imaging detects significant CAD with ~93% sensitivity and 80% specificity.
Observational (n=60)
After a 4-minute i.v. dipyridamole infusion, 0.14 mg/kg/min, serial thallium-201 scans were obtained in 60 patients undergoing cardiac catheterization. Forty patients had significant (greater than or equal to 50% stenosis) coronary artery disease (CAD), and 20 patients had normal coronary arteries or trivial lesions. The images were graded qualitatively for thallium activity by three observers. Sensitivity was 93% (37 of 40) and specificity was 80% (16 of 20). The sensitivity and specificity of the thallium-201 study were not affected by the extent of CAD, the presence of Q waves, or propranolol therapy. Twenty-seven of 37 patients who had initial defects (73%) had complete thallium redistribution of one or more defects. Patient-by-patient analysis using a regression model of all patients showed that the fate of a segmental thallium defect predicted abnormal wall motion by angiography better than ECG Q waves. The presence of propranolol therapy or collaterals did not significantly affect the thallium redistribution results. We conclude that qualitative interpretation by multiple observers of thallium images after dipyridamole infusion is a highly sensitive and specific test for CAD. After dipyridamole, as with exercise stress, the extent of thallium redistribution is related to the degree of myocardial wall motion abnormality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leppo et al. (1982) conducted an observational in Coronary artery disease (n=60). Serial thallium-201 myocardial imaging after dipyridamole infusion vs. Normal coronary arteries or trivial lesions (reference standard by angiography) was evaluated on Detection of significant coronary artery disease (≥50% stenosis). Serial thallium-201 myocardial imaging after dipyridamole infusion demonstrated 93% sensitivity and 80% specificity for detecting significant coronary artery disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: