Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The desert honeypot ant genus Myrmecocystus contains both diurnal and nocturnal species, which are subject to very different desiccation challenges when foraging. We measured water loss rates (WLRss) of live and dead M. mexicanus and M. mendax workers (nocturnal and diurnal foragers, respectively) in still and moving air at 30°C. In M. mendax , air flow and vital state significantly affected WLR; death increased WLR, as did air flow (but only in live ants). The WLR of M. mexicanus was unaffected by flow or vital state and was generally equivalent to that of M. mendax. Cuticular permeabilities of both species 10–20 μg H 2 cm −2 h −1 Torr −1 ) are similar to values for other xeric insects. The mean body water content of both species was very high at 84% of live body mass. Coordination failed after losing 71% (M. mexicanus) , and 51% (M. mendax) , of total original body water reserves. Paradoxically, therefore, the diurnal M. mendex workers are operationally more sensitive to desiccation; accordingly, in a desiccating environment they lost coordination more rapidly than M. mexicanus workers (mean 27 vs. 59 hr). We therefore found no evidence that WLRs or dehydration sensitivities of these worker ants reflected the differing dehydration challenges imposed by diurnal vs. nocturnal foraging strategies and suggest that this may reflect similar selective pressures not on workers, but on female reproductives during colony foundation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Duncan et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: