Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
CeO 2 nanocubes (c-CeO 2 ), nanoparticles (p-CeO 2 ), and nanorods calcined at 500 °C (r-CeO 2 -500) and 700 °C (r-CeO 2 -700) were used as supports to synthesize a series of Ni/CeO 2 catalysts for the propane combustion and oxidative dehydrogenation of propane (ODHP) reactions. The Ni-CeO 2 interaction greatly promotes the reducibility of CeO 2, but CeO 2 morphology-dependent Ni-CeO 2 interaction was observed to form different speciation of Ni species (Ni 2+ dissolved in CeO 2, highly dispersive NiO, NiO aggregate) and oxygen species (strongly activated oxygen species, medially activated oxygen species, weakly activated oxygen species) in various Ni/CeO 2 catalysts. Ni-CeO 2 interaction is stronger in Ni/c-CeO 2 catalysts than in other Ni/CeO 2 catalysts. Different morphology-dependences of Ni/CeO 2 catalysts in propane combustion and ODHP reactions were observed. The Ni/r-CeO 2 -500 catalyst with the largest strongly activated oxygen species is most catalytic active in the propane combustion reaction while the Ni/c-CeO 2 catalyst with the largest amount of weakly activated oxygen species exhibits the best catalytic performance in the ODHP reaction. Thus, the CeO 2 morphology engineering strategy is effective in finely tuning the metal-CeO 2 interaction and the reactivity of oxygen species to meet the requirements of different types of catalytic oxidation reactions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: