Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The ferrocene-based electron donors 1,1‘-bis[2-(4-(methylthio)phenyl)-( E )-ethenyl]ferrocene ( 2 ), 1,1‘-bis[2-(4-methoxyphenyl)-( E )-ethenyl]ferrocene ( 3 ), 1,1‘-bis[(1,3-dithiolo[4,5- b ][1,3]dithiol-2-ylidene)methyl]ferrocene ( 4 ), and 1,1‘-bis[(1,3-benzodithiol-2-ylidene)methyl]ferrocene ( 5 ) were found to react with ferrocenium bis(maleonitriledithiolato)nickelate (1−) ([FeCp 2 ] + [Ni(mnt) 2 ] -, 6 ) to afford the corresponding 1:1 paramagnetic salts 7 − 10, containing 1,1‘-disubstituted ferrocenium derivatives. SQUID magnetic susceptibility measurements of these new compounds showed a behavior dominated by antiferromagnetic interactions within pairs of [Ni(mnt) 2 ] - ions. Pressed pellets of compounds 7 ([ 2 ][Ni(mnt) 2 ]) and 9 ([ 4 ][Ni(mnt) 2 ]) are semiconducting, with a relatively large conductivity activation energy (0.85 and 1.13 eV). Crystals of 7 reveal the monodimensional nature of the compound. Each separate stack of [Ni(mnt) 2 ] - ions is flanked by two ferrocenium stacks. Ni−Ni distances alternate between 3.67 and 3.99 Å.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hobi et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: