Why the study?
Do echocardiographic and neurohormonal methods improve the detection of left ventricular dysfunction compared to clinical assessment in survivors of acute myocardial infarction?
Population
75 survivors of a recent acute myocardial infarction, aged 40 to 88 years, with no history of cardiac…
Comparison
Diagnostic assessment using echocardiography… vs Cross sectional echocardiographic algorithm for…
Design
Cross-sectional
Authors
Loading...
Clinical assessment underdetects low LVEF post-MI; hypothesis-generating for echo or BNP screening before practice change.
Do echocardiographic and neurohormonal methods improve the detection of left ventricular dysfunction compared to clinical assessment in survivors of acute myocardial infarction?
Echocardiography and plasma BNP are highly sensitive for detecting left ventricular dysfunction after acute myocardial infarction, whereas clinical assessment alone is inadequate and likely to miss affected patients.
Choy et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: