This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Objective: The aim of the study was to develop and validate a monosyllabic 50-word speech-in-noise test to be used in hearing aid fitting for comparison of speech recognition performance in the aided and unaided listening condition. Study design: One hundred and two adult hearing aid users were included in the study and tested at the final visit of their hearing aid fitting process. A speech recognition test, comprising the Swedish PB lists mixed with a standardized multi-talker noise, was performed with and without hearing aids. The International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA) was also administered to the patients and the audiologists provided their evaluation of the test in a post study survey. Results: The speech recognition scores revealed a statistically significant hearing aid benefit for 77% of the subjects; however, this objectively measured benefit was not significantly correlated to the total IOI-HA results. This would indicate that the two different tests demonstrate different aspects of the rehabilitation outcome and that the one cannot predict the outcome of the other. The speech-in-noise test was considered to be applicable as well as practical for clinical use. Conclusion: The results of this study show that a monosyllabic speech-in-noise test would provide valuable information in the hearing aid fitting process, in addition to already established quality measurement methods, i.e. ear canal measurements and outcome inventories.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grunditz et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: