Why the study?
Does inhibition of acetylcholine and nitric oxide alter forearm blood flow at exercise onset and recovery in human subjects?
Does inhibition of acetylcholine and nitric oxide alter forearm blood flow at exercise onset and recovery in human subjects?
Acetylcholine and nitric oxide additively contribute to resting forearm blood flow, while nitric oxide specifically contributes to the blood flow response during recovery from exercise.
Suggests modest ACh/NO roles in exercise hyperemia; extends resting FBF insights yet leaves open clinical translation.
The contributions of acetylcholine and/or nitric oxide (NO) to the rapid changes in human forearm blood flow (FBF) at the onset and recovery from mild exercise were studied in eight subjects. Rhythmic handgrip contractions were performed during brachial artery infusions of saline (2 ml/min; control), atropine (0.2 mg over 3 min), to block acetylcholine binding to muscarinic receptors, or atropine + NG-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA; 4 mg/min for 4 min), to additionally inhibit NO synthase. Brachial artery mean blood velocity (MBV; pulsed Doppler ultrasound) and diameter (echo Doppler) were measured continuously, and FBF was calculated. Atropine reduced acetylcholine-induced increases in FBF by approximately 71% (P < 0.05). FBF at rest was reduced by atropine and further reduced with atropine + L-NMMA. Both drug conditions reduced FBF during exercise by approximately 10% compared with control, with no difference between drug treatments. Brachial artery diameter was unchanged from rest by exercise, recovery, and drug treatments. Neither drug treatment altered the rate or magnitude of the increase in FBF above rest. Peak FBF after exercise was reduced by atropine and atropine + L-NMMA. Total FBF during 5 min of recovery was reduced with atropine + L-NMMA compared with control and atropine. The results suggest that 1) acetylcholine and NO mechanisms additively contribute to FBF levels at rest, 2) a cholinergic mechanism adjusts the absolute FBF levels during exercise, 3) neither acetylcholine nor NO is essential to observe the normal time course or magnitude of the exercise response, and 4) NO contributes to the FBF response during recovery from exercise.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shoemaker et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: