Why the study?
Does EDRF inhibition with L-NAME reduce hindlimb reactive and active hyperemia in conscious dogs?
Does EDRF inhibition with L-NAME reduce hindlimb reactive and active hyperemia in conscious dogs?
Inhibition of EDRF production with L-NAME reduces hindlimb reactive hyperemia and causes a constant offset in vascular conductance during active hyperemia in conscious dogs.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports EDRF role in canine hindlimb hyperemia; hypothesis-generating for nitric oxide in human vascular physiology.
We tested in conscious dogs whether endothelium-derived relaxing factor (EDRF) mediates hindlimb reactive and active hyperemia. Hindlimb reactive hyperemia was observed in response to release of a 1-min occlusion of the terminal aorta, and in separate studies, hindlimb active hyperemic responses to graded dynamic (treadmill) exercise were observed before and after inhibition of EDRF production [NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME); 5 mg/kg iv)]. At rest, L-NAME significantly increased mean arterial pressure (MAP) from control levels (100.6 +/- 6.2 vs. 125.0 +/- 7.3 mmHg) and significantly decreased heart rate (HR) (94.1 +/- 4.6 vs. 65.7 +/- 3.8 beats/min), terminal aortic blood flow (TAQ) (0.51 +/- 0.01 vs. 0.33 +/- 0.03 l/min), and terminal aortic vascular conductance (TAC) (5.2 +/- 0.4 vs. 2.7 +/- 0.1 ml.min-1.mmHg-1). L-NAME also significantly reduced the hindlimb hyperemia induced by intra-arterial acetylcholine (5 micrograms/kg). During reactive hyperemia L-NAME significantly reduced both the duration and maximal increase in TAC (16.2 +/- 1.6 vs. 10.4 +/- 0.8 s and 24.5 +/- 3.3 vs. 21.0 +/- 3.1 ml.min-1.mmHg-1, respectively). During graded exercise, MAP was significantly higher and HR significantly lower at each work load after L-NAME. During mild exercise, TAQ was significantly lower after L-NAME, whereas at higher work loads, L-NAME had no significant effect on TAQ. TAC was significantly reduced at each work load after L-NAME, but the difference from control remained constant with increasing work load; L-NAME caused a constant offset in TAC during graded exercise.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
O’Leary et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: