Why the study?
Does moderate to high leisure time physical activity reduce cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in adults without known cardiovascular disease irrespective of occupational physical activity?
Does moderate to high leisure time physical activity reduce cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in adults without known cardiovascular disease irrespective of occupational physical activity?
Leisure time physical activity provides significant survival benefits and reduces cardiovascular mortality regardless of the level of physical activity at work.
Leisure-time activity may extend survival across occupational levels; leaves open causal confirmation in randomized trials.
PURPOSE: To investigate if persons with high physical activity at work have the same benefits from leisure time physical activity as persons with sedentary work. METHODS: In the Copenhagen City Heart Study, a prospective cohort of 7,411 males and 8,916 females aged 25-66 years without known cardiovascular disease at entry in 1976-78, 1981-83, 1991-94, or 2001-03, the authors analyzed with sex-stratified multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression the association between leisure time physical activity and cardiovascular and all-cause mortality among individuals with different levels of occupational physical activity. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 22.4 years, 4,003 individuals died from cardiovascular disease and 8,935 from all-causes. Irrespective of level of occupational physical activity, a consistently lower risk with increasing leisure time physical activity was found for both cardiovascular and all-cause mortality among both men and women. Compared to low leisure time physical activity, the survival benefit ranged from 1.5-3.6 years for moderate and 2.6-4.7 years for high leisure time physical activity among the different levels of occupational physical activity. CONCLUSION: Public campaigns and initiatives for increasing physical activity in the working population should target everybody, irrespective of physical activity at work.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Holtermann et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: