Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: To compare the mean central corneal thickness (CCT) in patients with congenital aniridia to that of a group of age-matched control subjects. The findings of specular and confocal microscopy in a patient with aniridia are discussed. METHODS: The mean values of five consecutive pachymetry measurements of patients with aniridia and control subjects were used for analysis. Statistical analysis was performed with a Mann-Whitney rank sum test. Specular microscopy was performed on one patient with aniridia using a Konan Specular Microscope Noncon ROBO CA (Hyogo, Japan). Confocal microscopy through focusing was performed with the Tandem Scanning Confocal Microscope (Reston, VA). RESULTS: Mean CCT measured 691.8 +/- 75.4 mum for patients with aniridia (16 eyes of 10 patients) and 548.2 +/- 21.2 mum for control subjects (P < 0.001). Specular microscopy in a patient with aniridia showed normal endothelial cell counts and structure. Confocal microscopy through focusing of this patient showed normal-appearing keratocytes and a thick corneal stroma. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with congenital aniridia have significantly thicker corneas than do age-matched control subjects. This difference can have important implications for the treatment of those patients who develop secondary glaucoma. The increased CCT in patients with aniridia is not a result of endothelial dysfunction but appears to be the result of the production of a thickened but otherwise healthy cornea by the mutated PAX6 gene.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Whitson et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: