Effects of systemic endothelin A receptor antagonism in various vascular beds in men: In vivo interactions of the major blood pressure?regulating systems and associations with the C825T polymorphism

OBJECTIVE: We used the orally available endothelin A (ETA) receptor antagonist darusentan to characterize interactions between the major blood pressure-regulating systems in healthy men. Mediators of the endothelin system, the sympathetic nervous system, and the renin-angiotensin system act via G protein-coupled receptors with a possible involvement of the G-protein beta3 subunit (GNB3) C825T polymorphism. We studied the influence of this polymorphism on the responses to ETA antagonism in the presence of endothelin 1 (ET-1), norepinephrine (NA), and angiotensin II (ANGII). METHODS: Thirty-seven individuals were included in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial with 100 mg darusentan. Systemic hemodynamics and plasma ET-1, NA, and ANGII concentrations were assessed. Local studies were performed in the dorsal hand veins (n=18) and skin microcirculation (n=12), respectively. RESULTS: Darusentan lowered systolic and diastolic blood pressure ( P <.001 versus placebo) without any differences according to genotype (mean maximum Delta systolic blood pressure, -7 +/- 2 mmHg for CT/TT versus -5 +/- 3 mmHg for CC, P=.37; mean maximum Delta diastolic blood pressure, -3 +/- 2 mmHg for CT/TT versus -4 +/- 2 mmHg for CC, P=.96). Venoconstriction to ET-1 and NA was not affected by ET A blockade in either group; however, carriers of the 825T allele demonstrated a markedly enhanced venoconstriction to ET-1 and NA (median effective concentration [ED50] for ET-1 after darusentan [placebo]: 2.5 +/- 0.2 pmol/min for CT/TT [2.7 +/- 0.3 pmol/min], P=.42; 3.9 +/- 0.6 pmol/min for CC [4.6 +/- 0.3 pmol/min], P=.42; P=.046 [P=.0005] for CT/TT versus CC) (ED50 for NA after darusentan [placebo]: 5.2 +/- 1.2 ng/min for CT/TT [7.3 +/- 1.2 ng/min], P=.20; 32.9 +/- 7.1 ng/min for CC [19.7 +/- 5.5 ng/min], P=.75; P=.0008 [P=.026] for CT/TT versus CC). Darusentan dilated veins at baseline in CC homozygous subjects (+0.21 +/- 0.05 mm, P=.004 versus placebo). Systemic ET A antagonism inhibited constriction to ET-1 and also to NA and ANGII in the skin microcirculation without differences according to genotype (ET-1, P=.017 for all individuals versus placebo; NA, P=.0005; and ANGII, P=.002). CONCLUSION: GNB3 C825T allele carrier status did not influence systemic hemodynamic or local vascular responses to ET A blockade with darusentan in young, healthy men. However, it determined venoconstriction to exogenous ET-1 and NA. Darusentan markedly inhibited not only ET-1-induced but also NA-induced and ANGII-induced vasoconstriction in the skin microcirculation. In contrast, it had no effects on either ET-1-mediated or NA-mediated venoconstriction, indicating that, in the presence of high local ET-1 concentrations, constrictive endothelin B receptors may be of greater importance in the venous vasculature than has been recognized so far.