Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Abstract (η 6 ‐Arene)ruthenium( II ) complexes of the type [{[η 6 ‐C 6 H 5 (CH 2 ) n COOH]Ru(µ‐Cl)Cl} 2 ] ( 2a , n = 1; 3 , n = 3) with tethered carboxylate groups can be obtained by dehydrogenation of the appropriate cyclohexadiene with RuCl 3 ·3H 2 O. Formation of a κ O ‐coordinated chelate in weakly acidic solution is observed by means of a 1 H NMR titration for both [{η 6 ‐C 6 H 5 (CH 2 ) 3 COOH}Ru(aq)](OTf) 2 ( 3a′ ) and [{η 6 ‐C 6 H 5 (CH 2 ) 3 COOH}Ru(phen)(aq)](OTf) 2 ( 5′ ). Sandwich complexes of the type [{η 6 ‐C 6 H 5 (CH 2 ) 3 COOH}Ru(η 6 ‐amino acid)](OTf) 2 [amino acid = AcpheOH ( 6 ), ActyrOEt ( 7 ), ActrpOH ( 8 )] can be prepared by treating [{η 6 ‐C 6 H 5 (CH 2 ) 3 COOH}Ru(acetone) 3 ](OTf) 2 with the appropriate aromatic bioligand in CF 3 COOH ( 6 / 8 ) or CH 2 Cl 2 ( 7 ). Chemospecific η 6 ‐labelling of the C ‐terminal indole function is observed for the peptide HphetrpOH in the analogous complex 9 . Quantitative formation of 8 can also be achieved in aqueous solution in the presence of a 3:1 excess of the {η 6 ‐C 6 H 5 (CH 2 ) 3 COOH}Ru II fragment. This can also be employed for the N ‐terminal labelling of amino acids and peptides in its sandwich complex [(η 6 ‐C 6 Me 6 )Ru{η 6 ‐C 6 H 5 (CH 2 ) 3 COOH}](OTf) 2 ( 10 ). Coupling reactions by the carbodiimide method with EDC afford water‐stable complexes of the type [(η 6 ‐C 6 Me 6 )Ru{η 6 ‐C 6 H 5 (CH 2 ) 3 C(O)R}](OTf) 2 [R = trpOMe ( 11 ), pheOMe ( 12 ), glyglyOEt ( 13 )] in good yields. X‐ray structures of [(η 6 ‐C 6 H 5 CH 2 COOC 2 H 5 )RuCl(phen)](OTf) ( 4b′ ) and 10 are reported. (© Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 69451 Weinheim, Germany, 2003)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stodt et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: