Why the study?
Does lower limb continuous passive motion and passive movement affect heart rate compared to active movement in normal volunteers?
Does lower limb continuous passive motion and passive movement affect heart rate compared to active movement in normal volunteers?
Lower limb passive motion techniques produce minimal heart rate increases in normal volunteers, suggesting they may be safe for maintaining range of motion in patients with compromised cardiovascular systems.
Passive lower limb motion minimally affects heart rate in volunteers; leaves open applicability to cardiac patients.
Previous studies have indicated that passive movement of the lower limb may affect cardiopulmonary function via a neuronal reflex activated by afferent inputs from articular receptors. This study compared the effect of lower limb continuous passive motion, lower limb passive movement and lower limb active movement on heart rate in normal volunteers. These techniques are used extensively by physiotherapists in clinical practice. A knowledge of the influence of these techniques on cardiac function should be an important factor in designing maintenance programmes for patients with cardiovascular disorders. The study shows that while lower limb active movement has a significant effect on heart rate, lower limb passive movement and lower limb continuous passive motion produce only a small increase in heart rate. This suggests that lower limb passive motion and continuous passive motion are techniques which may be safely used as a means of maintaining lower limb range of movement and function in the treatment of patients whose cardiovascular system is compromised, although further study is necessary to establish that such patients respond similarly.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wright et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: