Why the study?
Does the combination of endothelial progenitor cells and ACE inhibitor/beta-blocker therapy improve left ventricular function in a rat model of myocardial infarction?
Does the combination of endothelial progenitor cells and ACE inhibitor/beta-blocker therapy improve left ventricular function in a rat model of myocardial infarction?
The combination of endothelial progenitor cells with standard ACE inhibitor and beta-blocker therapy provides additive benefits on left ventricular function and remodeling in a rat model of myocardial infarction.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Hypothesis-generating for additive EPC effects with ACE/BB post-MI; leaves open translation to human LV remodeling.
Animal studies have demonstrated the efficacy of endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) in preventing left ventricular (LV) remodelling following myocardial infarction (MI). Preliminary human studies are underway, yet no studies have demonstrated efficacy in combination with standard medical therapy, i.e. angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and beta-blockers. Nude rats underwent left anterior descending coronary artery ligation to induce MI. Animals were randomised to receive no treatment (MI, n = 5), quinapril 200 mg/L + metoprolol 2 g/L (ACE/BB, n = 5), two million EPCs intravenously (EPC, n = 5)or both (ACE/BB + EPC [n = 5]), then sacrificed after two weeks treatment. ACE/BB resulted in a 75% reduction in fibrosis in the region remote from the MI (p < 0.05), but EPC therapy had little effect here. Conversely, EPC therapy induced neovascularisation at the peri-infarct rim, thereby preventing peri-infarct apoptosis by 81% (p < 0.05). Acting via different but complementary mechanisms, the combination of ACE/BB + EPCs resulted in a greater overall improvement in LV function on echocardiography than either therapy alone. Clinical trials using stem cell therapy in conjunction with standard medical treatment are warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boyle et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: