The results of experiments designed to probe the mechanism by which the bis(μ-oxo)dicopper complexes [(LCu) 2 (μ-O) 2 ](ClO 4 ) 2 (L = 1,4,7-tribenzyl-, 1,4,7-triisopropyl-, and 1,4-diisopropyl-7-benzyl-1,4,7-triazacyclononane ligands; L Bn 3, L iPr 3, and L iPr 2 Bn, respectively) decompose to products arising from macrocyclic ligand N-dealkylation are described. After removal of copper from the decomposed solutions, analysis of the organic products revealed N-dealkylated ligands and aldehyde or ketone, the oxygen atoms in the latter being derived from the bis(μ-oxo)dicopper core as shown by 18 O-isotope labeling experiments. Thus, the overall N-dealkylation is akin to monooxygenase reactions carried out by various metalloenzymes such as cytochrome P450, dopamine β-monooxygenase, and peptidyl glycine α-amidating monooxygenase. Direct, intramolecular attack of the bis(μ-oxo)dicopper core at a ligand substituent C−H bond during the rate-determining step was indicated by the observed first-order kinetics, the results of H/D- and 16 O/ 18 O-isotope and double labeling experiments, large primary kinetic deuterium isotope effects (KIEs), and Eyring activation parameters. Tunneling was implicated in the C−H bond cleavage step by the temperature dependence of the KIEs. A Hammett study of the decay of suitably functionalized derivatives of L Bn 3 revealed a ρ value of −0.8, consistent with the diamagnetic bis(μ-oxo)dicopper core behaving as an electrophile during C−H bond scission like the active oxidant in cytochrome P450. Subsequent hydroxyl “rebound” or a concerted mechanism is then proposed to generate a carbinolamine intermediate that decomposes to secondary amine and ketone or aldehyde final products.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mahapatra et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: