Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
December 22, 2010CancerOpen Access

A comparison of charlson and elixhauser comorbidity measures to predict colorectal cancer survival using administrative health data

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

JLJessica LieffersUniversity of SaskatchewanVBVickie E. BaracosPennington Biomedical Research CenterMWMarcy WingetStanford Health Care

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Lieffers et al. (2010) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a708332e5469ee92be13bf7https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.25653
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Body Mass Index and Outcomes in Patients Who Receive Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Colon Cancer2006 · 329 citations
  2. 2Reverse epidemiology of conventional cardiovascular risk factors in patients with chronic heart failure2004 · 687 citations
  3. 3From the Help Desk: Comparing Areas under Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves from Two or more Probit or Logit Models2002 · 172 citations
  4. 4Regression modelling strategies for improved prognostic prediction1984 · 1,849 citations
  5. 5Estimating the Relative Risk in Cohort Studies and Clinical Trials of Common Outcomes2003 · 2,129 citations