Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Physical association of calcineurin with phosphatidylserine (PS) or phosphatidylglycerol (PG) was observed by molecular exclusion chromatography; the enzyme did not associate with phosphatidylethanolamine or phosphatidylcholine. The interactions with PS and PG were enhanced by Ca2+ which implicates a regulatory role for the Ca2+-binding subunit in this process. Addition of PG or PS to standard calcineurin assays elicited profound changes in enzymatic activity; phosphatidylcholine and phosphatidylethanolamine were without effect. Up to 23-fold stimulation of the calmodulin-independent activity was observed with phosphorylated histone H1 or synapsin I as the substrates. In contrast, the activity toward p-nitrophenyl phosphate and tyrosine phosphate was found to be inhibited. A characterization and comparison of the two opposite responses showed that: the phospholipids had insignificant effects on the Km for substrates, the phospholipid specificity for activation and inhibition was nearly indistinguishable, half-maximal activation and inhibition were obtained at similar concentrations of PG (K0.5 = 0.21 and 0.14 mg/ml, respectively), and calmodulin enhanced the responses to PG (K0.5 = 0.064 and 0.033 mg/ml for activation and inhibition, respectively) to similar extents. Together, these observations demonstrate that the two substrate-dependent responses of calcineurin are due to the association of the phosphatase with phospholipids and not a result of substrate-phospholipid interactions. This suggests that Ca2+- and calmodulin-stimulated interactions of calcineurin with acidic phospholipids may play a role in regulating the substrate specificity of this multifunctional phosphatase.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Politino et al. (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: