Key result
Vibration exposure linked to ~60% higher risk of first acute myocardial infarction.
Case-Control (n=475)
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVES: The main objectives of this study were to assess the risk of contracting first episode of myocardial infarction (MI) subsequent to vibration exposure and to assess a possible exposure-response relationship. METHODS: The Västernorrland heart epidemiology programme (VHEEP, a part of the Stockholm heart epidemiology programme study) was the source of the data. VHEEP is a population-based case-control study of risk factors for acute MI. Exposure information was collected by questionnaire and vibration exposure was assessed in 218 cases and 257 controls. Relative risks were estimated using odds ratios (ORs) from binary logistic regression. RESULTS: The results show that the OR of acute MI when exposed to vibration was 1.6 (95% CI: 1.1-2.4). It was not possible, however, to determine whether an exposure-response relationship was present. CONCLUSIONS: Working entailing vibrating machines is associated with an increased risk for acute MI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Björ et al. (2006) conducted a case-control in Acute myocardial infarction (n=475). Vibration exposure vs. No vibration exposure was evaluated on First episode of acute myocardial infarction (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.1-2.4). Vibration exposure was associated with an increased risk for a first episode of acute myocardial infarction (OR 1.6; 95% CI 1.1-2.4).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: