Why the study?
Does increased pericardial fat volume increase the frequency of ventricular premature beats in Asian patients?
Does increased pericardial fat volume increase the frequency of ventricular premature beats in Asian patients?
Increased volume of right ventricular pericardial fat is independently associated with a higher frequency of ventricular premature beats, suggesting a localized arrhythmogenic effect.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Pericardial fat volume may stratify ventricular arrhythmia risk; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical use.
BACKGROUND: Pericardial fat is correlated with the occurrence of atrial fibrillation or coronary atherosclerosis. However, the role of pericardial fat in ventricular arrhythmia remains unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients who had undergone dual-source computed tomography and 24-h Holter ECG were retrospectively enrolled. Quantification of the volume of pericardial fat surrounding the ventricles was analyzed using threshold attenuation of dual-source CT. The volume of pericardial fat was significantly different among those without ventricular premature beats (VPBs) in 24 h (n=28), those with occasional VPBs (n=54) and those with frequent VPBs (n=34) (12.5±6.1 cm(3)vs. 14±8.9 cm(3)vs. 29.9±17.3 cm(3), P<0.001). In addition, the number of VPBs strongly correlated with the volume of total pericardial fat (R=0.501, P<0.001), right ventricular (RV) pericardial fat (R=0.539, P<0.001), and left ventricular pericardial fat (R=0.376, P<0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that quartiles of RV localized pericardial fat significantly increased the risk of frequent VPBs (OR=3.2, P=0.047). Moreover, the number of VPBs in 24 h was significantly different among the patients with a fat volume within the 25th percentile, 25-75th percentile and 75th percentile. CONCLUSIONS: Pericardial fat (especially RV pericardial fat) was associated with the frequency of VPBs, which suggests the arrhythmogenic potential of ventricular pericardial fat. (Circ J 2016; 80: 1726-1733).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tam et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: