BACKGROUND: Few studies have evaluated long-term outcome after bracing using validated health related quality of life outcome measures. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the long-term outcome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) 12 years or more after treatment with the Boston brace. METHODS: 109 (80%) of 135 patients (7 men) with AIS treated with the Boston brace at a mean of 19.2 (range 12-28) years previously responded to long-term follow-up examination.All patients (n = 109) answered a standardised questionnaire including demographics, work status, treatment, Global Back Disability Question, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) (100-worst possible), General Function Score (GFS) (100 - worst possible), EuroQol (EQ-5D) (1 - best possible), EQ-VAS (100 - best possible)) and Scoliosis Research Society -22 (SRS - 22) (5 - best possible). Clinical and radiological examination was obtained in 86 patients. RESULTS: The magnitude of the primary prebrace major curve was in average 33.4 degrees (range 20 - 52). At weaning and at the last follow-up the corresponding values were 28.3 degrees (9-56) and 34.2 degrees (8 - 87), respectively. The mean age at follow-up was 35 (27 - 46) years. Work status was: full time (80%), on sick-leave (3%), on rehabilitation (4%), disability pension (4%), homemaker (7%), students (2%), 7% had changed their job because of back pain. 88% had had delivered a baby, 55% of them had pain in pregnancy. Global back status was excellent or good in 81%. The mean (standard deviation) ODI was 6.4 (9.8), GFS 5.4 (10.5), EQ-5D 0.84 (0.2), SRS-22: pain 4.2 (0.8), mental health 4.2 (0.7), self-image 3.9 (0.7), function 4.1 (0.6), satisfaction with treatment 3.7 (1.0). 28% had taken physiotherapy for back pain the last year and 12% had visited a doctor. CONCLUSION: Long-term results were satisfactory in most patients with AIS treated with the Boston brace.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lange et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: