Empirical study demonstrates substantial effects of differential legal status on immigrant socioeconomic trajectories, highlighting the state's role in institutional reproduction of inequality.
This article contributes to the broader scientific debate on how the state generates and modifies life chances of individuals and social groups by highlighting a specific way of institutional (re-)production of social inequalities: it explores the nature and impact of immigrant-specific state intervention. Building on the concept of “modes of incorporation” by Portes and colleagues, a theoretical section explicates how specific contexts of reception by the host government may impact on integration outcomes. An empirical study applies this model to Germany – an example of moderate socio-economic immigrant selection, but extensive legal stratification. I demonstrate substantial effects of differential government reception and legal status on socio-economic outcomes among adult immigrants and their children. A concluding section outlines how the model presented here could help advance comparative studies of immigrant incorporation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Janina Söhn (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: