Why the study?
Complications such as stroke and GI bleeding in LVAD patients may be linked to altered aortic hemodynamics caused by the LVAD outflow jet compared to physiological aortic flow.
Do varying LVAD outflow graft angles and flow pulsation alter aortic hemodynamics compared to baseline physiological flow in a computational model?
Do varying LVAD outflow graft angles and flow pulsation alter aortic hemodynamics compared to baseline physiological flow in a computational model?
Computational modeling demonstrates that LVAD outflow graft anastomosis angles and pulse modulation significantly alter aortic hemodynamics, including helicity, vorticity, and wall shear stress, compared to baseline physiological flow.
LVAD outflow may drive stroke and GI bleeding via aortic flow changes; leaves open causal confirmation and device optimization in prospective studies.
Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) comprise a primary treatment choice for advanced heart failure patients. Treatment with LVAD is commonly associated with complications like stroke and gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, which adversely impacts treatment outcomes, and causes fatalities. The etiology and mechanisms of these complications can be linked to the fact that LVAD outflow jet leads to an altered state of hemodynamics in the aorta as compared to baseline flow driven by aortic jet during ventricular systole. Here, we present a framework for quantitative assessment of aortic hemodynamics in LVAD flows realistic human vasculature, with a focus on quantifying the differences between flow driven by LVAD jet and the physiological aortic jet when no LVAD is present. We model hemodynamics in the aortic arch proximal to the LVAD outflow graft, as well as in the abdominal aorta away from the LVAD region. We characterize hemodynamics using quantitative descriptors of flow velocity, stasis, helicity, vorticity and mixing, and wall shear stress. These are used on a set of 27 LVAD scenarios obtained by parametrically varying LVAD outflow graft anastomosis angles, and LVAD flow pulse modulation. Computed descriptors for each of these scenarios are compared against the baseline flow, and a detailed quantitative characterization of the altered state of hemodynamics due to LVAD operation (when compared to baseline aortic flow) is compiled. These are interpreted using a conceptual model for LVAD flow that distinguishes between flow originating from the LVAD outflow jet (and its impingement on the aorta wall), and flow originating from aortic jet during aortic valve opening in normal physiological state.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sahni et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: