Why the study?
The utilization of big data has considerably increased over the last decade, transitioning beyond quality surveillance to approach key questions in acute pain and regional anesthesia research.
Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Design
Narrative review
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Big data and clinical registries are increasingly utilized to evaluate postoperative pain outcomes, opioid use, and regional anesthesia safety and efficacy.
The digital transformation of healthcare is advancing, leading to an increasing availability of clinical data for research. Perioperative big data initiatives were established to monitor treatment quality and benchmark outcomes. However, big data analyses have long exceeded the status of pure quality surveillance instruments. Large retrospective studies nowadays often represent the first approach to new questions in clinical research and pave the way for more expensive and resource intensive prospective trials. As a consequence, the utilization of big data in acute pain and regional anesthesia research has considerably increased over the last decade. Multicentric clinical registries and administrative databases (e.g., healthcare claims databases) have collected millions of cases until today, on which basis several important research questions were approached. In acute pain research, big data was used to assess postoperative pain outcomes, opioid utilization, and the efficiency of multimodal pain management strategies. In regional anesthesia, adverse events and potential benefits of regional anesthesia on postoperative morbidity and mortality were evaluated. This article provides a narrative review on the growing importance of big data for research in acute postoperative pain and regional anesthesia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Müller‐Wirtz et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: