Why the study?
Atrial esophageal fistula is a rare but feared complication of AF catheter ablation, prompting various preventative technologies and strategies that need systematic appraisal.
Do esophageal protection strategies prevent atrial esophageal fistula in patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation?
Do esophageal protection strategies prevent atrial esophageal fistula in patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation?
Various periprocedural strategies, including esophageal temperature monitoring, cooling, and deviation, are available to mitigate the risk of atrial esophageal fistula during atrial fibrillation ablation.
AEF risk during AF ablation warrants continued esophageal protection efforts; review extends understanding but leaves optimal strategies open.
Catheter ablation has emerged as an effective treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF). Atrial esophageal fistula (AEF) is a rare, but feared complication. With increasing utilization of ablation therapy for AF, the understanding of the relationship between AEF and ablation has been improved in recent years. Efforts to reduce the risk of AEF have focused on decreasing the risk of severe esophageal injury (EI) and the presumed subsequent progression from EI to AEF, including esophageal temperature monitoring, esophageal cooling systems, esophageal deviation devices, and decreasing and/or curtailing ablation energy delivery. Periprocedural assessment may help identify higher risk patients and detect early esophageal lesions. This review systematically summarizes and evaluates the current strategies and techniques utilized to reduce the risk of AEF in the clinical workflow for AF ablation. We expect that this review will help clinicians to better understand the principles, advantages, and disadvantages of these methods, and to find suitable strategies using current available tools.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jiang et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: