Why the study?
Current LAA occlusion and exclusion techniques and devices to prevent stroke have shortcomings, prompting the need to validate a novel LAA inversion procedure.
Does left atrial appendage inversion safely and feasibly eliminate LAA dead space in a swine model?
Does left atrial appendage inversion safely and feasibly eliminate LAA dead space in a swine model?
LAA inversion is a safe and feasible procedure in a swine model that effectively eliminates LAA dead space without leaving permanent devices, potentially offering a novel approach to prevent embolic stroke.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
LAA inversion feasible in pigs; leaves open translation to human AF stroke prevention.
Objective: Left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion or exclusion has been used in patients with atrial fibrillation to prevent stroke, but the techniques and devices have shortcomings. This study aims to validate the safety and feasibility of a novel LAA inversion procedure. Methods: LAA inversion procedures were done in six pigs. Before the procedure and at 8 weeks postoperatively, heart rate, blood pressure, and electrocardiogram (ECG) were recorded. The serum concentration of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) was measured. The LAA was observed and measured by transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) and intracardiac echocardiogram (ICE). At 8 weeks after LAA inversion, the animal was euthanized. The heart was collected for morphology and histology, including hematoxylin-eosin, Masson trichrome, and immunofluorescence staining. Results: TEE and ICE showed that LAA was inverted, and the inversion was maintained during the 8-week study duration. Food intake, body weight gain, heart rate, blood pressure, ECG, and serum ANP level were comparable before and after the procedure. Morphology and histological staining showed that there was no obvious inflammation or thrombus. Tissue remodeling and fibrosis were observed at the LAA inverted site. Conclusion: The inversion of LAA effectively eliminates the dead space of LAA and thus may reduce the risk of embolic stroke. The novel procedure is safe and feasible, but the efficacy in reducing embolization remains to be demonstrated in future studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: