Why the study?
While continuous laboratory exercise measurements yield clinically relevant biomarkers like HR and VO2 kinetics, it remains unclear how wearable device data during daily-life routines can provide meaningful biomarkers.
Can valid HR and V̇O2 kinetics be obtained from continuous measurements with wearable devices during outdoor walks in patients with COPD?
Can valid HR and V̇O2 kinetics be obtained from continuous measurements with wearable devices during outdoor walks in patients with COPD?
Wearable devices can provide valid heart rate and oxygen uptake kinetics during daily-life outdoor walks in COPD patients, potentially enabling unsupervised telemonitoring of physical fitness.
Wearable HR/VO2 kinetics feasible in daily routines; leaves open clinical utility and standardization.
Objective Continuous physiological measurements during a laboratory-based exercise test can provide physiological biomarkers, such as heart rate (HR) and oxygen uptake (V̇O 2 ) kinetics, that carry clinically relevant information. In contrast, it is not clear how continuous data generated by wearable devices during daily-life routines could provide meaningful biomarkers. We aimed to determine whether valid HR and V̇O 2 kinetics can be obtained from measurements with wearable devices during outdoor walks in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods HR (Polar Belt) and V̇O 2 (METAMAX3B) were measured during 93 physical activity transitions performed by eight patients with COPD during three different outdoor walks (n tr = 77) and a 6-minute walk test (n tr = 16). HR and V̇O 2 kinetics were calculated every time a participant started a walk, finished a walk or walked upstairs. HR and V̇O 2 kinetics were considered valid if the response magnitude and model fit were adequate, and model parameters were reliable. Results Continuous measurements with wearable devices provided valid HR kinetics when COPD patients started or finished (range 63%–100%) the different outdoor walks and valid V̇O 2 kinetics when they finished (range 63%–100%) an outdoor walk. The amount of valid kinetics and kinetic model performance was comparable between outdoor walks and a laboratory-based exercise test ( p > .05). Conclusion We envision that the presented approach could improve telemonitoring applications of patients with COPD by providing regular, unsupervised assessments of HR kinetics during daily-life routines. This could allow to early identify a decline in the patients’ dynamic physiological functioning, physical fitness and/or health status.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Buekers et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: