Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background Hayes (1991 Hayes S. Sex offenders. Australia and New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities 1991; 17: 221–227[Taylor & Francis Online] , [Google Scholar]) and Day (1994 Day K. Male mentally handicapped sex offenders. British Journal of Psychiatry 1994; 165: 630–639[Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) have developed hypotheses about the importance of social and developmental variables in the aetiology of sexual offences in offenders with intellectual disability. The present study is the first of its kind to investigate the perceived quality of life and relationships of sex offenders in comparison to an appropriate control group.Method A group of 28 sex offenders with intellectual disability (ID) were compared with 28 members of a control group of individuals with ID. All participants completed the Significant Others Scale (SOS) which assesses self‐perceptions of potential and ideal support from significant others in the individual's life, and the Life Experience Checklist (LEC) which assesses experiences and opportunities across 5 living domains: home, leisure, freedom, relationships and opportunities.Results There were no differences between the groups on age and IQ. On the SOS there were no differences between the groups on the number of times each significant other was reported. Actual and ideal levels of support from both mother and father were lower for sex offenders than the control group. On the LEC, sex offenders reported lower scores on the relationships and leisure sections.Conclusions Poorer relationships and little indication of any wish to change that state of affairs suggests lower levels of integration and identification with society for sex offenders compared with the control group.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Steptoe et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: