Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A visible-light driven H(2) evolution system comprising of a Ru(II) dye (RuP) and Co(III) proton reduction catalysts (CoP) immobilised on TiO(2) nanoparticles and mesoporous films is presented. The heterogeneous system evolves H(2) efficiently during visible-light irradiation in a pH-neutral aqueous solution at 25 °C in the presence of a hole scavenger. Photodegradation of the self-assembled system occurs at the ligand framework of CoP, which can be readily repaired by addition of fresh ligand, resulting in turnover numbers above 300 mol H(2) (mol CoP)(-1) and above 200,000 mol H(2) (mol TiO(2) nanoparticles)(-1) in water. Our studies support that a molecular Co species, rather than metallic Co or a Co-oxide precipitate, is responsible for H(2) formation on TiO(2). Electron transfer in this system was studied by transient absorption spectroscopy and time-correlated single photon counting techniques. Essentially quantitative electron injection takes place from RuP into TiO(2) in approximately 180 ps. Thereby, upon dye regeneration by the sacrificial electron donor, a long-lived TiO(2) conduction band electron is formed with a half-lifetime of approximately 0.8 s. Electron transfer from the TiO(2) conduction band to the CoP catalysts occurs quantitatively on a 10 μs timescale and is about a hundred times faster than charge-recombination with the oxidised RuP. This study provides a benchmark for future investigations in photocatalytic fuel generation with molecular catalysts integrated in semiconductors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lakadamyali et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: