Angle-resolved energy-distribution measurements of secondary-electron emission (SEE) from metals reveal spectral fine structure that relates directly to the density distribution of the one-electron states throughout E-→K space located above the vacuum level Eᵥ. The angular dependence of the SEE spectra from (100), (110), and (111) tungsten surfaces has been studied as a function of polar angle 0^∘Θ70^∘ along azimuthal directions φ such that the energy- and angle-resolved SEE current jSEE(E, Ω) effectively scans states throughout the 1/48th irreducible body-centered-cubic zone. Calculations have been carried out in both "reduced" and "extended" →K space in order to assess the relative contribution of elastic umklapp scattering to the density distribution of contributing states profiles. The results indicate that the overall secondary-electron yield may be represented as the sum of basically two contributions ${J}SEEᵗᵒᵗᵃˡ={∫}{0}^{{π}}d{Ω}{∫}{0}^{{E}ₘₐₓ}{j}SEE (E, {Ω})dE={J}SEEᵇᵘˡᵏ+{J}SEEˢᵘʳᶠᵃᶜᵉ$. The bulk contribution represents emission due to Bloch waves propagating out of states in the semi-infinite crystal; the surface contribution represents that part of the current due to evanescent waves at the metal-vacuum interface. In addition, transmission-induced spectral features are observed (transmission resonances), which are not related to the density-of-states fine structure, but are due to a quantum-mechanical enhancement in the escape probability arising from wave-function matching at the emitter-vacuum interface. Bulk and surface band-structure effects are concurrently manifest in the SEE spectra via the wave-matching conditions imposed at the solid-vacuum interface. The results are discussed within the general conceptual framework provided by "the (time-reversed) incoming final-state wave-function" approach to electron emission phenomenology of metal surfaces, thereby establishing a relationship with recently developed low-energy electron diffraction, photoemission, and field-emission formalism.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Willis et al. (1978) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: