Why the study?
Does video-assisted angioscopy improve clinical and hemodynamic outcomes in patients undergoing pulmonary thromboendarterectomy for post-embolic pulmonary hypertension?
Does video-assisted angioscopy improve clinical and hemodynamic outcomes in patients undergoing pulmonary thromboendarterectomy for post-embolic pulmonary hypertension?
Video-assisted angioscopy during pulmonary thromboendarterectomy significantly improves clinical and hemodynamic outcomes in patients with post-embolic pulmonary hypertension by expanding visibility to distal disease.
May support video-assisted angioscopy in pulmonary thromboendarterectomy; leaves open need for randomized trials to confirm benefit in post-embolic pulmonary hypertension.
OBJECTIVES: To assess whether the use of video-assisted angioscopy would increase the outcome of pulmonary thromboendarterectomy (PTE). METHODS: PTE included a median sternotomy, intrapericardial dissection of the superior vena cava, institution of cardiopulmonary bypass, deep hypothermia and sequential circulatory arrest periods. It was always performed through two separate arteriotomies on both main intrapericardial pulmonary arteries, into which a rigid 5 mm angioscope connected to a video camera was introduced to increase the visibility and endarterectomies. RESULTS: From January 1996 to July 1998, 68 consecutive patients (35 males and 33 females) aged 54.3 +/- 13.5 years underwent PTE. Patients were in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II (n = 2), III (n = 43) or IV (n = 23) with the following hemodynamics: mean pulmonary arterial pressure (PAP) 54 +/- 13 mmHg; cardiac output (CO): 3.8 +/- 0.8 l/min, and total pulmonary resistance (TPR): 1207 +/- 416 dyne x s x cm(-5). The cumulated circulatory arrest time was 23 +/- 12 min and postoperative length of ventilatory support 10 +/- 12 days. Nine patients died, for an overall in-hospital mortality of 13.2%. The functional outcome in surviving patients was significantly improved (P < 0.0001) both clinically (NYHA class 3.2 +/- 0.5 vs. 1.3 +/- 0.6) and hemodynamically (PAP (mmHg) 53.1 +/- 13 vs. 30.2 +/- 11.8, CI (l/min per m2) 2.1 +/- 0.5 vs. 2.8 +/- 0.6, TPR (dyne x s x cm(-5)) 1174 +/- 416 vs. 519 +/- 250). CONCLUSIONS: Video-assisted angioscopy improves the quality and degree of pulmonary endarterectomy expanding the indications to include patients with previously inaccessible distal disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dartevelle et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: