Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
NO-TILL cropping systems (con-tinuous soybeans, soybean-corn rotation, and soybeans double-cropped with wheat) were very effec-tive in reducing erosion. Soil loss from conventional-till soybeans was sig-nificantly higher than that from any of the no-till systems. No significant differences in soil loss were found between any of the no-till treatments. Erosion control benefits were greatest during storms with excessive rate rainfall.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McGregor et al. (1975) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: