Why the study?
Factorial and construct validity, along with reliability, of the Russian version of the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) needed evaluation in cardiac patients.
Is the Russian version of the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) a reliable and valid tool for assessing social support in patients with coronary artery disease?
Is the Russian version of the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) a reliable and valid tool for assessing social support in patients with coronary artery disease?
The Russian version of the MSPSS is a reliable and valid tool for evaluating perceived social support in patients with coronary artery disease.
Russian MSPSS demonstrates high reliability in CAD; leaves open routine clinical use pending outcome-linked validation.
Objective: To assess factorial and construct validity along with reliability of the Russian version of the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) in cardiac patients.Methods: The study included 1018 patients with coronary artery disease. All patients were offered the opportunity to complete a questionnaire to detect psychosocial risk and protective factors, including the MSPSS.Results: Internal consistency of the Russian version of the MSPSS was high: Cronbach’s alpha coefficient in the group of patients with stable angina was .91 vs. .90 in the group with acute coronary syndrome. The three-factor structure of the MSPSS was proved with exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. As expected, the Russian version of the MSPSS was negatively correlated with measures of anxiety and depression, and positively correlated with curiosity.Conclusions: The Russian version of MSPSS corresponds closely with the English version in reliability, consistency, and internal structure. Test–retest reliability was satisfactorally high and construct validity was supported with the results of the correlation analysis.Clinical Implications: Our study confirms that MSPSS questionnaire is a high valid tool to estimate social support and it can be successfully applied to define social support in patients with cardiac pathology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Пушкарев et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: