Why the study?
Endothelial injury is increasingly recognized after radiation therapy, prompting this review to provide a current understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms and predictive biomarkers of radiation-induced vascular injury.
Early detection of radiation-induced vascular injury using a combination of imaging and multi-omic biomarkers could facilitate timely interventions to prevent accelerated atherosclerosis and cardiovascular events in cancer survivors.
May warrant vascular surveillance in RT survivors; leaves open validation of predictive biomarkers before clinical adoption.
OBJECTIVE: Cancer survivorship has thrown the spotlight on the incidence of nonmalignant chronic diseases in cancer patients. Endothelial injury is increasingly recognized as a consequence of cancer treatment, particularly after radiation therapy (RT). This review is to provide a current understanding on the pathophysiological mechanisms and predictive biomarkers of radiation-induced vascular injury. RECENT FINDINGS: Radiation directly impacts vasculature by causing endothelial apoptosis and senescence, and alterations in normal homeostasis. This altered milieu at the endothelial surface may contribute to a systemic chronic inflammatory state that is superimposed upon the cascade of normal senescence processes leading to acceleration of age-related disorders, atherosclerosis, and chronic fibrosis. Vasculature imaging, blood-based or cell-component biomarkers, and signatures of genomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and radiomics are potential tools for detection of vascular damage after irradiation. CONCLUSIONS: Development of a valid prediction model by combining an array of imaging tools, blood-based biomarkers, coupled with novel predictors like exosomes and metabolic degradation products can serve to identify RT-induced vascular injury early for subsequent introduction of newer therapeutic approaches to counter radiation morbidity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Venkatesulu et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: