This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Introduction Maximal and rapid force production represent the principal metrics of neuromuscular performance, yet both show substantial inter-individual and day-to-day variability. Biological sex and training history are known to considerably affect the absolute magnitude of these measures; however, their influence on variability is unclear. Methods To address this gap, we examined twenty-two young adults (12 males, 10 females), balanced for strength-trained (ST) and recreationally active (RA) status, who performed maximal ballistic isometric elbow-flexion trials in two sessions separated by 48–72 h. We assessed maximal voluntary force (MVF), rate of force development (RFD), and impulse during the initial 250 ms from force onset, and estimated maximal muscle-fiber conduction velocity (MFCV MAX ) from high-density EMG over the same window. Day-to-day variability was computed for all these metrics. Results Both sex and training history significantly affected absolute MVF, RFD, and impulse ( p < 0.05). In contrast, MFCV MAX differed only by training history, being 0.14 m·s −1 higher in ST ( p < 0.05). ST participants also showed lower between-day variability in RFD and MFCV MAX than RA ( p< 0.05). However, no differences were found for sex. Maximal RFD and impulse strongly correlated with MFCV MAX across all groups ( R² >0.6, p < 0.01). Discussion Because MFCV MAX is considered an indirect marker of the recruitment of larger motor units, our results suggest that ST participants may recruit relatively larger motor units during the initial contraction phase compared with RA individuals. In addition, more stable RFD across days is associated with comparable contribution from similarly sized motor units. Thus, within the present sample, day-to-day stability in rapid force appeared to be more strongly associated with training-related consistency than with biological sex.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lecce et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: