This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
gene. A typical phenotype is well defined, with cognitive impairment, characteristic facial dysmorphism, hypotonia, gastrointestinal, skeletal, urogenital, and hematological anomalies as characteristic features. With a few notable exceptions, general phenotypic differences related to specific ATRX protein domains are not well established and should not be used, at least at the present time, for prognostic purposes. The phenotypic spectrum and genotypic correlations are gradually broadening, mainly due to rapidly increasing accessibility to NGS. In this scenario, it is important to continue describing new patients, illustrating the mode and age of onset of the typical and non-typical features, the classical ones and those tentatively added more recently. This report of well-characterized and mostly unreported patients expands the ATR-X clinical spectrum and emphasizes the importance of better clinical delineation of the condition. We compare our findings to those of the largest ATR-X series reported so far, discussing possible explanations for the different drawn conclusions.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vaisfeld et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: