Why the study?
Does the choice of initial antihypertensive medication class or blood pressure target intensity affect blood pressure reduction at 6 months?
Does the choice of initial antihypertensive medication class or blood pressure target intensity affect blood pressure reduction at 6 months?
At 6 months, initial treatment with calcium antagonists, ACE inhibitors, or ARBs yielded similar blood pressure reductions, though target blood pressures were not fully achieved.
Initial classes yield equivalent 6-month BP reductions regardless of target intensity; confirms class similarity but underscores challenges achieving targets.
BACKGROUND: The Hypertension Objective treatment based on Measurement by Electrical Devices of Blood Pressure (HOMED-BP) study is a large-scale intervention trial to determine both optimal target blood pressure (BP) on the basis of self-measured BP at home, and optimal initial antihypertensive medication. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the quality of randomization at the end of March 2003, and BP-controlled conditions during initial 6 months. METHODS: We evaluated the number of patients randomized by the end of March 2003, and BP changes during the initial 6 months based on intention-to-treat analysis. RESULTS: By the end of March 2003, a total of 1086 patients (12% of a planned randomization of 9000 patients) had been randomized. Among 653 patients who had been followed for > or =6 months after randomization, mean systolic/diastolic BPs at randomization in the calcium antagonist, angiotensin-converting enzyme and angiotensin II receptor blocker groups were 149/89, 150/89 and 149/88 mmHg, respectively. Blood pressures were reduced after 3 months (137/83, 139/82 and 136/82 mmHg, respectively), and further reduced after 6 months (134/81, 135/80 and 133/80 mmHg, respectively), with no significant differences identified between groups. In more- and less-intensive BP-lowering groups, mean systolic/diastolic BPs at randomization were 149/88 and 150/89 mmHg, respectively. Although BPs were reduced after treatment for 3 months (137/83 and 137/82 mmHg, respectively) and 6 months (134/80 and 135/80 mmHg, respectively) in each target group, significant differences were still not observed between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Good quality of randomization was observed at the end of March 2003, but rate of achievement for target BPs was insufficient.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saito et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: