This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
A clinical trial was performed to evaluate 3BNC117, a potent anti_HIV_1 antibody, in infected individuals during suppressive antiretroviral therapy (ART) and subsequent analytical treatment interruption (ATI). The circulating reservoir was evaluated by quantitative and qualitative outgrowth assay (Q 2 VOA) at entry and after 6 months, prior to ATI. Although there were no significant quantitative changes in the size of the reservoir, the composition of circulating reservoir clones varied over the 6_month period before treatment interruption in a manner that did not correlate with antibody sensitivity. The neutralization profile obtained from the reservoir by Q 2 VOA was predictive of time to rebound after ATI, and thus of antibody efficacy. Although 3BNC117 binding site amino acid variants found in rebound viruses pre_existed in the latent reservoir, only 3 of 217 rebound viruses were identical to 868 latent viruses. Instead many of the rebound viruses appeared to be recombinants, even in individuals with resistant reservoir viruses. By incorporating the possibility of recombination, 63% of the rebound viruses could have derived from the observed latent reservoir. In conclusion, viruses emerging during ATI in individuals treated with 3BNC117 are not the dominant species found in the circulating reservoir, but instead appear to represent recombinants. Summary In the setting of a clinical trial evaluating the anti_HIV_1 antibody 3BNC117, Cohen et al. demonstrate that rebound viruses that emerge following interruption of antiretroviral therapy are distinct from circulating latent viruses. However, rebound viruses often appear to be recombinants between isolated latent viruses.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cohen et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: