Why the study?
Baroreflex activation therapy has been used to treat HFrEF, but supporting literature on its efficacy and safety remains limited.
Does baroreflex activation therapy improve echocardiographic parameters, quality of life, and exercise capacity in patients with HFrEF?
Does baroreflex activation therapy improve echocardiographic parameters, quality of life, and exercise capacity in patients with HFrEF?
Baroreflex activation therapy appears to improve left ventricular ejection fraction, quality of life, and exercise capacity in patients with HFrEF, though larger trials are needed to confirm these findings.
Background: In recent years, baroreflex activation therapy (BAT) has been utilized to treat heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, the supporting literature on its efficacy and safety is still limited. This investigation elucidates the effects of BAT in HFrEF patients to provide a reference for future clinical applications. Methods: This investigation follows Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. Relevant investigations on the use of BAT in HFrEF patients were searched and selected from 5 databases, including Web of Science, MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library, from inception to December 2022. The methodological quality of eligible articles was assessed via the Cochrane risk of bias tool, and for meta-analysis, RevMan (5.3) was used. Results: Randomized controlled trials comprising 343 participants were selected for the meta-analysis, which revealed that in HFrEF patients, BAT enhanced the levels of LVEF (MD: 2.97, 95 % CI: 0.53 to 5.41), MLHFQ (MD: -14.81, 95 % CI: -19.57 to -10.06) and 6MWT (MD: 68.18, 95 % CI: 51.62 to 84.74), whereas reduced the levels of LVEDV (MD: -15.79, 95 % CI: -32.96 to 1.37) and DBP (MD: -2.43, 95 % CI: -4.18 to -0.68). Conclusion: It was concluded that BAT is an efficient treatment option for HFrEF patients. However, to validate this investigation, further randomized clinical trials with multiple centers and large sample sizes are needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shi et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: