Contemporary Foucauldian research generally considers that our present is characterized by a positive type of power that invests life and posits a radical distinction between sovereign power and discipline/biopolitics. At the heart of this distinction is the supposed incompatibility between the law and the norm. However, a closer study of Foucault’s history of truth lends itself to a rereading of that perspective. The defining feature of contemporary society no longer resides in the innovations that marked the eighteenth century, but are rooted in a fundamental experience of truth: the juridical form of truth. Therefore, sovereign power, discipline, and biopolitics must all be considered as manifestations of a same form of truth which both objectifies and produces effects of domination. The study of this form of truth allows us to consider Foucault’s critical project from a new perspective and highlights the inherent unity of Foucault’s work on power–knowledge apparatuses and to his later works on ethics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alexandre Macmillan (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: