Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The efficacy of [14C]glucose molecules labeled in various positions as tracers of regional cerebral glucose utilization (rCMRGlc) was examined in rats. Arteriovenous differences of different [14C]-glucose species and 14CO2 were measured across brain to determine the relative rates of 14CO2 loss. As anticipated, 14CO2 evolution decreased in the order: [U-14C]glucose greater than [2-14C]glucose greater than [1-14C]glucose greater than [6-14C]glucose. Release of 14CO2 from [6-14C]glucose was undetectable at 5 min and barely detectable at 10 min, and release from [1-14C]glucose, which includes the pentose phosphate pathway, was only slightly greater. rCMRGlc was measured with [1-14C]-,[2-14C]-, or [6-14C]glucose in 5-min experiments. The results of [1-14C]- and [6-14C]glucose were indistinguishable; no difference due to the activity of the pentose phosphate pathway was found. Both [1-14C]- and [6-14C]-glucose gave values similar to, but on the whole slightly higher than, [2-14C]glucose. It was concluded that when knowledge of total rCMRGlc is required, [6-14C]glucose is the labeled substrate of choice. When the experimental objective is measurement of energy metabolism, use of [1-14C]glucose avoids inclusion of the nonenergy-yielding pentose phosphate pathway.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hawkins et al. (1985) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: