Why the study?
Does a TaqMan-RT-PCR assay rapidly and accurately detect classical swine fever virus in experimentally infected swine compared to viral cultures?
Does a TaqMan-RT-PCR assay rapidly and accurately detect classical swine fever virus in experimentally infected swine compared to viral cultures?
A newly developed TaqMan-RT-PCR assay provides a rapid (≤2 h) and sensitive method for detecting classical swine fever virus before clinical onset.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May enable earlier experimental detection in swine; leaves open field validation before veterinary adoption.
A fluorogenic-probe hydrolysis (TaqMan)-reverse transcriptase PCR assay for classical swine fever virus (CSFV) was developed and evaluated in experimentally infected swine. The assay detected CSFV, representing different phylogenetic groupings, but did not amplify viral RNA from related pestiviruses. The assay met or exceeded the sensitivity (1 to 100 50% tissue culture infective doses per ml) of viral cultures of samples from experimentally infected animals. Viral RNA was detected in nasal and tonsil scraping samples 2 to 4 days prior to the onset of clinical disease. The assay can be performed in 2 h or less, thus providing a rapid method for the diagnosis of classical swine fever.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Risatti et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: