Why the study?
The study was conducted to analyze perioperative results and long-term survival of re-sternotomy for surgical aortic valve replacement in octogenarians in the age of evolving transcatheter therapies.
Does isolated redoSAVR compared to associated redoSAVR affect inpatient mortality and long-term survival in octogenarian patients?
Does isolated redoSAVR compared to associated redoSAVR affect inpatient mortality and long-term survival in octogenarian patients?
Re-sternotomy for surgical aortic valve replacement in octogenarians carries significant morbidity and mortality, highlighting the importance of considering emerging transcatheter therapies in this high-risk population.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
RedoSAVR in octogenarians carries notable risks; leaves open optimal selection versus transcatheter options in shared decisions.
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to analyze perioperative results and long-term survival of re-sternotomy for surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in octogenarians in age of transcatheter therapies. METHODS: This is a retrospective, single-center study (April 2000 to December 2019). Perioperative data were compared for re-sternotomy with isolated SAVR (Isolated redoSAVR) and re-sternotomy with SAVR and concomitant cardiac procedure (Associated redoSAVR). Regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of in-patient mortality. Hazard ratios and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were compared for groups. RESULTS: There were 163 patients (Isolated redoSAVR; 69, Associated redoSAVR; 94). Emergency/salvage cases were excluded. The median age was 83 (81-85) years and the median logEuroSCORE was 19.2 (13.0-26.7)%. The follow-up was 4.2 ± 3.5 years. Inpatient mortality was 4.9% (1.4% vs. 7.4% for Isolated redoSAVR and Associated redoSAVR respectively, p = .08). TIA/stroke rate was 8% (9% vs. 7% for Isolated redoSAVR and Associated redoSAVR, respectively, p = .78). COPD was a predictor of inpatient mortality (odds ratio: 8.86; 95% confidence interval: 1.19-66.11, p = .03). Survival was 88.7%, 86.4%, 70.1%, 49.5%, and 26.3% at 1, 2, 5, 7, and 10 years. There was no survival difference between Isolated redoSAVR and Associated redoSAVR (log rank p = .36, Wilcoxon p = .84). Significant adverse predictors of long-term survival were COPD, postoperative TIA/stroke, and length of stay. Survival was lower than age and gender-matched first-time SAVR and general population of the United Kingdom. CONCLUSION: RedoSAVR in octogenarians is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Shared decision-making should consider emerging transcatheter therapies as a valuable option in selected patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luthra et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: