This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Kinetic studies of the hematoporphyrin–sensitized photooxidation of l-tryptophan and tryptamine at pH 10 in either homogeneous aqueous solutions or in aqueous dispersions of Triton X–100 and cetyltrimethylammonium bromide micelles indicate that the indole substrates are attacked via a mixed type I (electron transfer from triplet dye)/type II (1O2-involving) mechanism. Both reactive intermediates, generated by micelle-solubilized hematoporphyrin, can diffuse to attack substrate molecules located in either the bulk aqueous phase or a different micelle. In particular, incorporation of the substrate into a micelle has only minor effects on its reactivity toward1O2, although the 1O2—indole interaction appears to be more efficient in cationic micelles owing to a favourable orientation of the target with respect to the attacking species. On the other hand, the electron transfer from triplet porphyrin to a micellized substrate is virtually non-operative when the latter is located in an anionic micelle, whereas in neutral or cationic micelles, the efficiency of the process is again controlled by the substrate orientation. Studies of tryptamine photooxidation sensitized by meso-tetra-(4-sulfonato-phenyl) porphine in the presence of sodium dodecylsulphate micelles lend further support to the abovementioned conclusions.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rossi et al. (1981) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: